North deals, nobody vulnerable.
♠ 76
♥ 653
♦ AK10653
♣ 43
♥ 653
♦ AK10653
♣ 43
♠ KJ2
♥ K94
♦ Q82
♣ 9652
♥ K94
♦ Q82
♣ 9652
♠ Q1084
♥ AQJ
♦ J
♣ KQJ107
♥ AQJ
♦ J
♣ KQJ107
♠ A953
♥ 10872
♦ 974
♣ A8
♥ 10872
♦ 974
♣ A8
North's hand is a textbook 2♦ opening but at our table she passed; probably playing one of those abominable strong and artificial 2♦ conventions.
So I opened 1♣ and partner responded 1NT, opponents staying silent.
It's hard to know if partner's best suit is clubs or diamonds (my opening promised only 2 cards), but my thinking was that notrump scores better than clubs, and too much bidding around will only help the defence. I rebid 2NT and partner raised to 3NT.
This played very poorly after North led 4th best.
If instead I had rebid a more scientific 2♠, partner then has a bidding problem. In light of the spade fit 3♣ seems too conservative. 4♣ gives up on 3NT. Is ♦Q82 a stopper? Is ♥K94 a good enough stopper? 3♣, 3♥, 3♠, 3NT and 4♣ all seem plausible.
With questionable values in the red suits I like 4♣ best, but that's easy to say when looking at all the cards. What do you think?
And I suppose East should pass 4♣ with only one Ace and one King. This is all a very narrow path to the best result. In this game nobody ended in clubs below the 5-level.
Finally, before trashing my 2NT call too badly, consider the case where I have a small diamond instead of a small club. Then everyone would open 1NT and end in the just-as-bad 3NT contract, but might have made it only because South would be on lead and probably wouldn't lead a diamond.